<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>droit.lu&#187; Marc Thewes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.droit.lu/?author=2&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.droit.lu</link>
	<description>Le blog du droit luxembourgeois</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2015 06:13:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>(Français) Profession d&#8217;avocat – Les conditions de reconnaissance des diplômes étrangers devant la Cour européenne</title>
		<link>http://www.droit.lu/?p=212&#038;lang=en</link>
		<comments>http://www.droit.lu/?p=212&#038;lang=en#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 09:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Thewes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Profession d'avocat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberté d'établissement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reconnaissance des diplômes d'enseignement supérieur]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droit.lu/?p=212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p><span id="more-212"></span></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droit.lu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=212&#038;lang=en</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Commissions Green Paper on the modernisation of EU public procurement policy</title>
		<link>http://www.droit.lu/?p=196&#038;lang=en</link>
		<comments>http://www.droit.lu/?p=196&#038;lang=en#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Thewes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droit public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marchés publics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vergaberecht]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droit.lu/?p=196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 27th, 2011, the European Commission has published a Green Book on the modernisation of the European Public Procurement Market and launched a consultation on the subject. In a statement, the Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier said: &#8220;We need to clarify public procurement rules to make life easier for both public authorities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p>On January 27th, 2011, the European Commission has published a Green Book on the modernisation of the European Public Procurement Market and launched a consultation on the subject.</p>
<p>In a statement, the Internal Market and Services Commissioner Michel Barnier said:<em> &#8220;We need to clarify public procurement rules to make life easier for both public authorities and companies bidding for contracts in Europe. Access of smaller companies to procurement markets, reducing red tape, or promoting European cross-border procurement will be under the spotlight during the consultation. My ambition is also to make sure that public procurement can help job creation, innovation, and protection of the environment.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>The Green Paper identifies a number of key areas for possible reform and asks for stakeholders&#8217; views on options for legislative changes. Some of the issues covered are the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do the current procedures need to be simplified, in particular for small local and regional authorities? How can this usefully be done without jeopardizing essential guarantees for transparency and non-discrimination amongst bidders?</li>
<li>How can we reduce red tape for economic operators, notably SMEs? How can bidding across intra-European borders be facilitated?</li>
<li>Under which conditions should contracts between public authorities be exempted from the application of EU public procurement rules?</li>
<li>Should the EU public procurement rules be modified to allow other policy objectives such as promotion of innovation or environmental or social considerations to be better taken into account? For instance, should there be EU rules establishing obligations to buy only products respecting certain environmental conditions or to set aside a certain percentage of the budget for innovative goods and services? Are customised rules needed for the procurement of social services of general economic interest, to better match the specificities of these services?</li>
<li>Do we need stricter rules or better safeguards to prevent favouritism, corruption or conflicts of interest?</li>
<li>How can efficient competition in procurement markets be guaranteed? For instance, how could the development of dominant suppliers, bid rigging or market sharing between bidders be avoided?</li>
<li>What should be done to improve the access of European undertakings to third country public procurement markets?</li>
</ul>
<p>Responses to the Green Paper should be sent to the following address: markt-consult-pp-reform@ec.europa.eu no later than April 18th, 2011.</p>
<p>Link: <a href="http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/consultations/docs/2011/public_procurement/20110127_COM_en.pdf">Green Paper</a></p>
Note: There is an email link embedded within this post, please visit this post to email it.
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droit.lu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=196&#038;lang=en</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conformité à la Constitution de la loi prévoyant la confiscation obligatoire du véhicule en cas de récidive de conduite en état d&#8217;ivresse</title>
		<link>http://www.droit.lu/?p=175&#038;lang=en</link>
		<comments>http://www.droit.lu/?p=175&#038;lang=en#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 05:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Thewes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Droit constitutionnel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droit pénal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egalité devant la loi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conduite en état d'ivresse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confiscation du véhicule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution luxembourgeoise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Récidive de circulation en état d'ivresse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droit.lu/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><p><span id="more-175"></span></p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droit.lu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=175&#038;lang=en</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recently published: Journal des tribunaux Luxembourg, December 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.droit.lu/?p=87&#038;lang=en</link>
		<comments>http://www.droit.lu/?p=87&#038;lang=en#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 04:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Thewes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egalité devant la loi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exequatur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interprétation de la loi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journal des tribunaux Luxembourg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Loi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Preuve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rentrée solennelle du Barreau de Luxembourg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droit.lu/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Table of contents of Journal des tribunaux Luxembourg published 31 December 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Table of contents of Journal des tribunaux Luxembourg published December 31st, 2010</strong></p>
<div>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Doctrine: Rentrée solennelle du Barreau de Luxembourg du 4 juin 2010</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Discours de Me Pierre Hurt: Attendu que la loi est claire&#8230; - Propos irrévérencieux sur l’utilisation de l’argument du sens clair en jurisprudence luxembourgeoise</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Réplique du Bâtonnier Gaston Stein</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Jurisprudence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Cour constitutionnelle, 1er octobre 2010</p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;">I. Sources du droit &#8211; Contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois &#8211; Cadre de référence du contrôle &#8211; Principes généraux du droit &#8211; «Règle de la séparation des pouvoirs» &#8211; Notion de loi - Reconnaissance de la catégorie des normes législatives individuelles - II. Égalité devant la loi &#8211; Conditions de la dérogation au principe &#8211; Exigence d’une justification rationnelle de la différence de traitement.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><span id="more-87"></span>Cour d’appel, 8e ch., 14 juillet 2009</p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;">Droit international privé &#8211; Jugements étrangers (règlement (CE) no 44/2001) - Reconnaissance et exécution - I. Exception d’ordre public - Condamnation civile pour abus de biens sociaux, prononcée par une juridiction répressive étrangère &#8211; Exigence d’une double incrimination (non) - II. Impossibilité, pour le président du tribunal d’arrondissement, d’ordonner l’exécution provisoire de l’ordonnance d’exequatur.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Cour d’appel, 1re ch., 10 mars 2010</p>
<p style="padding-left: 90px;">Preuve testimoniale &#8211; Demande en divorce/en séparation de corps - Capacité à témoigner &#8211; Concubin du descendant commun &#8211; Non.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Chronique judiciaire</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">Melchior Wathelet, Adieu, M. le professeur. De la liberté des juges nationaux de poser des questions préjudicielles à la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne.</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droit.lu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=87&#038;lang=en</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>(Français) Quel juge pour le contentieux des commandes par Internet?</title>
		<link>http://www.droit.lu/?p=81&#038;lang=en</link>
		<comments>http://www.droit.lu/?p=81&#038;lang=en#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 14:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marc Thewes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[European Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contrat conclu par internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Droit de la consommation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juge compétent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.droit.lu/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[</p>
<p><span id="more-81"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.droit.lu/?feed=rss2&#038;p=81&#038;lang=en</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
